Listeria contamination in facilities and on products prompt warnings from FDA

As a part of its enforcement actions, the Meals and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities below its jurisdiction. Some letters aren’t posted for public view till weeks or months after they’re despatched. Enterprise homeowners have 15 days to reply to FDA warning letters. Warning letters usually aren’t issued till an organization has been given months to years to appropriate issues. The FDA steadily redacts components of warning letters posted for public view.


Onofrio’s Contemporary Minimize Inc.
New Haven, CT

A meals agency in Connecticut is on discover from the FDA for severe violations after inspectors discovered Listeria within the firm’s manufacturing facility.

In a Jan. 10, 2022, warning letter the FDA described inspections on July 13-29, 2021, at Onofrio’s Contemporary Minimize Inc. in New Haven, CT.

The FDA’s inspection revealed that the agency was not in compliance with FDA laws and resulted within the issuance of an FDA Kind 483.

A number of the cited violations:

Hazard Evaluation and Threat-Primarily based Preventive Controls Violations:

  1. The agency didn’t appropriately consider contamination with environmental pathogens, reminiscent of Listeria monocytogenes, to find out whether or not it’s a hazard requiring a preventive management in its fresh-cut produce.

FDA’s inspection included the gathering of environmental swabs on July 13, 2021, in the course of the manufacturing of ready-to-eat (RTE) vegetables and fruit. 4 of 71 swabs had been confirmed constructive for Listeria monocytogenes. The constructive findings included a mixing room flooring drain adjoining to a desk the place RTE celery was being minimize, forklift wheels, a wheel on a rolling cart holding shrimp and seafood salad substances, and a packing room broom deal with.

The recurring presence of Listeria monocytogenes of their facility is critical in that it demonstrates their sanitation procedures have been insufficient to considerably reduce or stop Listeria monocytogenes within the facility. 

  1. The agency didn’t establish and implement an applicable preventive management to offer assurances that any hazards requiring a preventive management can be considerably minimized or prevented and the meals manufactured, processed, packed, or held by their facility is not going to be adulterated.

Particularly, they didn’t set up supply-chain controls for pathogens reminiscent of Listeria monocytogenes, pathogenic E. coli, and Salmonella on the receiving step for incoming produce. 

Present Good Manufacturing Apply:

  1. The agency’s plant was not constructed in such a way that drips or condensate from fixtures, ducts and pipes doesn’t contaminate meals or food-contact surfaces. Particularly, on July 14, 2021, FDA investigators noticed the next circumstances:
  • Condensate droplets on the underside of the refrigeration unit above a blue bin containing RTE child carrots and above the (redacted) conveyor within the vegetable washroom.
  • Condensate droplets on the ceiling all through the vegetable mixing room immediately above uncovered RTE greens together with peppers, onions, and zucchini, and above food-contact surfaces.
  1. The agency’s plant didn’t have satisfactory sanitary amenities and lodging, as a result of plumbing was not adequately put in and maintained to keep away from constituting a supply of contamination to meals, water provides, tools, or utensils or creating an unsanitary situation. Particularly, on July 13, 2021, the hand wash sink positioned on the finish of the (redacted) conveyor within the vegetable washroom was leaking a considerable amount of water onto the ground whereas in use. Additional, on July 14, 2021, a small quantity of water was leaking from beneath the identical hand wash sink (close to the pedals) onto the ground. The agency defined that the leak on the hand sink was due to a clogged drain.
  2. The agency didn’t clear and sanitize their utensils and tools in a way that protects towards contamination of food-contact surfaces. Particularly, on July 15, 2021, in the course of the pre-operational inspection, the reducing board within the vegetable reducing room failed inspection and was recleaned. Throughout recleaning, an worker was noticed inserting a bucket containing cleaning soap answer, which was beforehand positioned on the manufacturing room flooring, on high of the reducing board in the course of the wash step. Moreover, the identical worker positioned the water hose spray nozzle that was beforehand on the manufacturing room flooring onto the discharge facet of the (redacted) conveyor.
  3. The agency didn’t clear non-food-contact surfaces of kit in a way and as steadily as needed to guard towards contamination of meals. Particularly, on July 14, 2021, an worker was noticed rinsing the ground and reducing boards with a water hose within the mixing room. Overspray from the hose was in shut proximity to 2 partially lined bins with RTE minimize celery.
  4. The agency didn’t take satisfactory precautions to make sure that manufacturing procedures don’t contribute to contamination. Particularly, on July 13, 2021, whereas staff had been processing RTE onions within the (redacted) room, the (redacted) line was stretched throughout the manufacturing room flooring after which draped over a bin containing RTE processed onions.

The complete warning letter could be considered here.

Harmony Farms Inc.
Vernon, CA

An import firm in California is on discover from the FDA after an inspection was initiated by a recall. The recall was as a result of Listeria monocytogenes was discovered on their recent enoki mushrooms.

In a Jan. 6 warning letter, the FDA described a July 20 by means of Aug. 3, 2021, International Provider Verification Program (FSVP) inspection of Harmony Farms Inc. in Vernon, CA.

The FDA’s inspection revealed that the agency was not in compliance with FSVP laws and resulted within the issuance of an FDA Kind 483a.

The agency’s vital violations of the FSVP regulation are as follows:

  1. The agency didn’t develop, preserve, and observe an FSVP. Particularly, they didn’t develop an FSVP for every of the next meals that they import:
  • Ginger Root imported from (redacted)
  • Pear imported from (redacted)
  • Ginger Root imported from (redacted)
  • Bamboo Shoots from (redacted)
  • Ginger Root imported from (redacted)
  • Ginger Root imported from (redacted)
  1. The agency should conduct a written hazard evaluation for every kind of meals they import to find out whether or not there are any hazards requiring a management. Nevertheless, they didn’t present FDA with any documentation that they reviewed and assessed their overseas provider’s hazard evaluation.
  2. The agency should approve their overseas suppliers on the premise of an analysis of their overseas suppliers’ efficiency and the chance posed by the meals for the merchandise they import. In approving their overseas suppliers and figuring out the suitable provider verification actions, the agency didn’t contemplate the overseas suppliers’ procedures, processes, and practices associated to the security of the meals. Furthermore, the agency’s analysis didn’t contemplate relevant FDA meals security laws and data related to the overseas suppliers’ compliance with these laws. Particularly, the agency’s enoki mushrooms imported from (redacted), shipped to them by (redacted), their enoki mushrooms imported from (redacted), and their oyster mushrooms imported from (redacted), are uncooked agricultural commodities, nevertheless, their provider analysis and approval information dated July 8, 2021, didn’t show consideration of the suppliers’ compliance with the necessities of the Produce Security Rule.
  3. The agency’s provider verification actions didn’t present satisfactory assurance that the hazards requiring a management within the meals they import have been considerably minimized or prevented.

Particularly, the agency’s “FSVP International Provider Verification Exercise(ies) Worksheets” dated July 8, 2021, for enoki mushrooms imported from (redacted), shipped to them by (redacted), enoki mushrooms imported from (redacted), and oyster mushrooms from (redacted), describe their verification actions as “security report assessment” and the justification for his or her verification actions as “SAHCODHA Haz (yearly onsight audit).” The information they offered to show their verification actions for these meals and suppliers embody GlobalGAP certificates, HACCP System certificates, a certificates for “nonpesticides crop,” and testing outcomes for heavy metals in water. Nevertheless, these information don’t point out whether or not they verified their suppliers’ compliance with the Produce Security Rule and don’t evaluate the requirements on which the certificates are based mostly to the extent of public well being safety offered by the Produce Security Rule.

  1. The agency should be certain that, for every line entry of meals product supplied for importation into the US, the agency’s identify, electronic mail handle, and distinctive facility identifier acknowledged as acceptable by FDA, figuring out them because the importer of the meals, are offered electronically when submitting entry with U.S. Customs and Border Safety. Nevertheless, the required data was not offered to establish them because the FSVP importer for a number of shipments of mushrooms they imported.

The complete warning letter could be considered here.

(To enroll in a free subscription to Meals Security Information, click here.)

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.